Washington Square Park Under Renovation/Assault

Flier for tour - led by Cathryn of the Washington Square Park Blog

Flier for tour - led by Cathryn of the Washington Square Park Blog

This Sunday I took a tour of the under-construction Washington Square Park with Cathryn of the Washington Square Park Blog and WSP Community Improvement District. 7 or so people showed up for a politicized discussion of the park’s history and future.

Our running discussion focused on why – Just why anyone needs such drastic changes to a fine public space, why anyone would undertake such an expensive and seemingly frivolous renovation without, for instance, even having a planner for the new playground.

An enclave on the North side of the park

An enclave on the North side of the park

One of the biggest changes will be the elimination of the circular enclaves of benches throughout the east side of the park. These spaces are the focal point for musicians performing on the weekends in particular, and allow park goers to take their time and just sit in the shade, instead of treating the park as a thoroughfare of commerce or policing.

Benches vs. Lawn - Benches win.

Benches vs. Lawn - Benches win.

The new park will expand lawn space at the expense of bench-seating and the ‘theater in the round’ space surrounding the fountain. Walking through the park, the error of this approach becomes obvious immediately – very few people spend time on the lawn relative to the number of people sitting on benches. Overall, this will make the park less usable, and less amenable to unexpected interactions with musicians, protesters, or even friends.

Kimmel.  Epitomizes the problems with NYU's donation to the renovation.

Kimmel. Epitomizes the problems with NYU's donation to the renovation.

The Kimmel Center for University Life demonstrates the relationship between NYU and the park. The ‘front’ of Kimmel faces out towards the park; most of this side of the building is covered in windows, while the other side has almost none. NYU wants to make the park the backdrop to advertisements for itself; the million dollars it put towards the renovation creates a park that is easier to police and less interesting to anyone besides students walking through between classes. Kimmel was a similar effort to eliminate public space: the Loeb Student Center it replaced contained 19 more student offices, more student meeting rooms and provided a real space to assemble. Kimmel provides a sanitized, easy to police version of the previous student center, not unlike the relationship of the new park to the old.

Chess tables, but not for long.

Chess tables, but not for long.

Renovation will reduce the number of chess tables in Washington Square Park. That sucks.

A half-completed walkway.

A half-completed walkway.

The new park will put in planters along the main walkways leading to the center of the park from the east and west.

Disingenuous bullshit

Disingenuous bullshit.

To justify the renovation, Parks refers to ‘restoring the 1870’ fountain and returning the park to its historical function. Turns out this doesn’t really matter – what matters is whether the park provides for the real people inhabiting it now, and the renovation almost intentionally runs amuck over the contemporary uses of the park. Also, the most important history of the park occurred during the 60s and 70s, as a site for counterculture revolutionaries and the anti-war movement – when the park was grungy (not covered in granite and filled with lawns), and the fountain was off-center from the arch.

Welcome to your new park.

Welcome to your new park.

This is of the Northwest corner of the park. Each corner will look roughly like this one – straight paths, no benches, etc. etc…

At the end, we still didn’t have answers. No one could even imagine a reason to want the changes being made. Whether due to pure institutional inertia (“well, we changed Tompkins and Union Square, on to Washington Square…”), or some secret kind of self interest we as the public may never know, the Parks Department has undertaken a renovation of the park that seems to serve almost no one that actually uses it, without public input, at the behest of multimillionaire tobacco profiteers and an institution that intentionally makes itself almost totally unaccountable to its students or the public.

3 responses to “Washington Square Park Under Renovation/Assault

  1. no no no no no NO.
    one of my favorite memories was in that exact north circular bench.
    i’m going to chain myself to it. I WILL.

  2. Pingback: Politics As Puppetry Provides a Review of Washington Sq Park Blog’s Walking Tour Sunday « Washington Square Park

  3. Leah, you should! You care about it, they are trying destroy it, why not? I hope more people do more acts of civil disobedience too! It would show just how much we DON’T want this insane redesign, and also bring attention to what is going on, when very few people seem to understand what is happening behind the pretty “Working to improve your parks:):):)” sign. We also need to put stuff up on that fence. I know it will be torn down, but you just keep putting it back up. I want people to come ALIVE and fight for this park… That is the only way we have any chance of saving it from yuppie, corporate hell.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s