First of all: a shoutout to techPresident for being a great resource for thinking about the relationship between technology and politics. Full of consistently engaging and challenging work, and just generally pretty dope.
Anyways – the much-ado about Obama’s plan to use the internet to govern needs some fleshing out. The key remains changing the internet from a tool of access and transparency into a tool for people (writ-large) to make decisions. Questions remain about how to transform feedback and criticism into decision-making authority, and transparency into power for the people viewing. As it stands, the folks in government being monitored by internet-tools often still have the authority to act as they please, even if hundreds of thousands of voices dissent.
At the very least, internet tools put into more explicit terms the incongruencies of power and time that define the modern bureaucracy. In the same way that I think that Obama’s Presidency throws into better contrast certain types of exploitation (and makes certain new stridant critiques more sayable), internet transparency movements do the work of making critiques of state power more visible and potent.